Skip to main content

129 posts tagged with "pending"

View All Tags

All my friends…

· 3 min read

Go to Flickr to see this
image

I have just finished my read-some-old-presents period. The last casualty has been this “All my friends are going to be strangers” by Larry McMurtry. McMurtry is, among other things, the winner of a Pulitzer prize and co-author of the screenplay for “Brokeback Mountain”. My uncle gave this book to me three years ago.

Even if I'm not as capable of a good review as malglam, here follows a brief opinion on the novel.

I found it difficult at the beginning to identify myself with the main character, or any of the other characters; the main reason being their exaggerated impulsiveness and ability to switch from love to anger and back. I'm very cerebral and sometimes take ages to make decisions; so reading about people who get married one week after meeting their partner for the first time or give away their car to a couple of hitchhikers, that tinged a bit the story with irreality. Characters that were being friendly the minute before, become suddenly crazy and start insulting or beating each other. Complete strangers seem open and generous as if they were good old friends of the main character's. There are surrealistic situations and dialogs, too; but I laughed with some of those.

“I have no real resistance to temptation, drunk or sober. […] I just don't have any moral coordination.”

“I had known all along that my brain was not going to win any fights ─ or impress any girls.”

Despite of this, I discovered that I was glad to read again about credible feelings of human beings in a realistic story. I had been missing that before. I had been lately going out with elves, spiders and psychokinetic teens. But this is a novel whose ingredients are writers, literature, friends, girlfriends, love, sex, loneliness and the search for happiness. And it's easy to read. So I got hooked.

Now the interesting thing is that by the middle of the book I started to feel empathetic with the main character, this young writer-to-be divided between his love for things (books, of course) and his love for people (women, no doubt), feeling utterly alone and more and more different from anyone he knows, without a clue about where he will be in a few days time, nor about how to find happiness.

“He had long ago concluded that I didn' lead a normal life.”

“All the furniture of my life had been changed around.”

“All the people I had things in common with were thousands of miles away.”

I liked the in crescendo that are the last chapters, and the end of the book, too. In general, I think I liked this book.

Reading others' presents before tackling the pila may let you discover books that otherwise you would had missed.

Relatividad

· One min read

«Nacen miles de estrellas
por el choque de dos galaxias»

En la portada de ElPais.es, ayer.

Con cosas tan importantes sucediendo a mi alrededor, yo no debería estar preocupado por mi presentación de la próxima semana, ¿verdad?

Entrying the forbidden planet

· One min read

Thanks to the visit of my friends Helio & Puri last month, I went at last to Forbidden Planet, a shop (the shop) for scifi/fantasy/comic/manganime/figure/game-flavoured freaks in London :¬)

It's blissful, a nerdy paradise. Two pretty large floors full up with books, graphic novels, manga, magazines, figures, games and DVD's. Fortunately, photos are allowed (as long as you don't take any photo of the tills [?]) so here there are some images of the interior of the store.

I reassert my early appreciation about London: the best things it has are its parks and its bookshops.

Go to Flickr to see this
image

My 1% of September 2006 goes to Oxfam

· 3 min read

I have decided to donate 1% of my salary to some private voluntary organization, every month.

I will consider my net income, so this will be after deducting the usual 27% in normal taxes (yes, I pay taxes of 27%!). 1% seems to me quite a symbolic figure and easy to calculate, and it's above the usual 0,7% that most NGO's claim to the governments of the world. Very roughly, if seven in ten citizens did the same thing, 0,7% of the country's wealth would go to development and solidarity projects. 1% of my current net income is near or above the amounts of money that those organizations usually set as standard subscriptions.

And I prefer to make single donations every month instead of becoming a member because I don't feel like choosing the one NGO. This way I can easily change recipient, in case I find a better one and depending on the circumstances. When I was a member of Greenpeace, I used to receive mail and their magazine at least once a month. But today we don't need paper and stamps any more to keep up to date.

Last Friday, being 28th, I received my payslip.

I must admit that I initially thought of Oxfam because of their great advertising campaign ─their ads flood the walls of the underground carriages─ and the elegant public image that they present. Then I tried to remember what kind of connection do they have with the Catholic Church, recalling that in Spain they are actually “Intermón Oxfam”. But Wikipedia told me that

Oxfam International is a confederation of 12 independent, non-profit, secular, community-based aid and development organizations who work with local partners in over 100 countries worldwide to reduce poverty, suffering, and injustice. It is a member of the OneWorld Network, which seeks to `to promote sustainable development, social justice, and human rights.' [...] Oxfam International was founded in 1995. Oxfam Great Britain is based in Oxford, UK. It was founded in England in 1942 as the Oxford Committee for Famine Relief by Canon Theodore Richard Milford (1896–1987) and the Oxford Meeting of the Quakers (which included Edith Pye and the Gilletts), with a mission to send food through the Allied blockade to the citizens of Nazi-occupied Greece.”

(I think that Araceli can tell us more about what is Oxfam and what they do).

After visiting their web page, I went for Oxfam Great Britain.

Even Stevphen on Islam vs. Christianity

· One min read

Via Chewie's well-formed strings I discover “Even Stevphen”, the section that Steve Carell and Stephen Colbert have in “The Daily Show” (Comedy Central). It's a delightful exercise of intelligent humour in an elegant format.

I was just about to post their wonderful debate on medical marihuana, but I decided that this rational discussion about Islam vs. Christianity is even better.

BTW, Colbert is that one famous journalist that spoke for 24 minutes during the last White House Correspondents Dinner, corageously making so much fun of Bush and his administration. Chewie and I recommend not to miss that video, neither. (If you did read last month's “Wired”, you already know who he is).

Celebrar la miseria

· 6 min read

A dios pongo por testigo que nunca conseguiré entender por qué la gente más estúpida disfruta tanto exhibiendo su imbecilidad en TV.

Desde que vivo en un piso con tele y me salpica la programación británica en [de]prime time, estoy descubriendo un infragénero de serie Z que, hasta donde yo sé, aún no ha llegado a España (ojo, que en pocos meses lo tendréis en la Europa continental): el «reality show temático pseudoformativo». Todos estos escaparates de la miseria humana tienen en común la figura de un «experto» que en cada programa llega a un hogar distinto para ayudar a la familia a solucionar un problema relacionado con su especialidad. En todos los casos, resulta que la solución más eficiente y justa es asesinar un poco o bastante a todos y cada uno de los miembros de la familia. Sin embargo, el experto indefectiblemente se entrega con pasión a hurgar en los detalles del problema hasta sacar pelotillas, en una celebración gloriosa de la bajeza, la indecencia y la estulticia del hombre (y de la mujer, que no se me enfaden las feministas).

Éste es el bestiario provisional que he elaborado, en orden creciente de toxicidad:

La Supernanny, una Rottenmeyer metiendo en cintura a mocosos malcriados. La verdad es que la chica, de lidiar con enanos sabe un rato. Pero viendo a los padres, uno se pregunta por qué el niñato en cuestión no se ha suicidado antes. ¿Cómo se puede chillar sistemáticamente a pulmón sacado a diez pulgadas de un niño? ¿Eso no es maltrato psicológico?

The teen tamer (algo así como «la domadora de adolescentes»). Pues eso. Otra vez hay que quitarse el sombrero con el buen hacer de la experta («never tell anyone to calm down ─ it will only get things worse»). El fallo del programa es que no hay otro experto al lado para asesorar sobre la herramienta apropiada a utilizar con el adolescente. Por ejemplo: «en este caso, vamos a volarle la cabeza a la pava de tu niña con un bazooka. Y nuestro experto nos recomienda arrancarle antes las uñas con unos alicates». Para que os hagáis una idea, el día que yo vi el programa, el paciente era este angelito. Una chavala encantadora. Pero tenía tres problemillas que sus padres querían resolver: primero, no iba nunca al colegio; segundo, entre todos los tacos e insultos a veces se le escapaba una palabra decente; y tercero, se había follado a todo su barrio, varias veces, y siempre sin usar gorrito. Cosas de niños. La madre decía que nunca negaba nada a su hija, porque la quería mucho o_O La adolescente ésta tenía todo lo que a mí me vuelve loco en una mujer, los atributos más femeninos y encantadores: fea, fumadora, vaga, mentirosa, caprichosa, gorda, hortera, malhablada, imbécil y grosera. Una joya.

El tercer engendro de mi lista es un programa en el que los ingleses abren sus pocilgas, digo sus casas, y muestran sin el menor rubor la costra marrón de alimentos resecos que acumulan sus alfombras, cómo los yogures del año pasado se han hecho fuertes dentro del frigorífico, y los simpáticos artrópodos que les recorren la bañera. Entonces llegan las expertas en quitar mierda, que son dos mujeres (¿dónde están las feministas esta vez?), que estudian la situación, elaboran una estrategia, deciden qué es lo más adecuado… y, bueno, básicamente… limpian la casa. Inteligente solución, ¿verdad?

Y llegamos al primer puesto de la lista, medalla de hojalata, que es para You are what you eat. Para resumir, ahí va la simbiosis: en este país la gente come muy mal. Hay muchos gordos, la gente siempre está picando porquerías en vez de almorzar como dios manda, los niños se atiborran de grasas y azúcares. El día que vi este programa, la «experta» llegó a una casa en la que bastaba con ver una foto de los padres para adivinar que los hijos no iban a morir de desnutrición, precisamente. De nuevo, son necesarios un par de doctorados para dar con la solución al problema: comer menos y mejor, y mover el culo. La experta se dedica a humillar a la madre por dar de comer tan mal a la familia, hasta hacerla llorar. Y les pone a todos un chándal y los pone a dar saltitos. Pero ahora viene lo peor: el padre, un tipo de mirada bovina que parece feliz con la papeleta que le ha tocado, se mete en el baño con una fiambrera. (¿Podré contarlo? No… que dios me asista… ahora me falla el pulso…) Después de un buen rato, sale y le entrega el maloliente fruto de su esfuerzo a la experta, quien conduce a toda la familia a la cocina, llevando consigo la «muestra» destapada. (Llegados a este punto, mi compañero de piso y yo nos miramos alarmados, intentando convencernos de que no estábamos viendo lo que estábamos viendo). Pues sí. Reunidos todos alrededor de la mesa de la cocina, venerando el pino plantado por el padre, la experta explicó con todo detalle que aquel olor fétido era señal de pésima alimentación. Aprendí también que uno debe poder oir con claridad el impacto del inquilino desalojado contra el agua, porque eso garantizará que tiene la consistencia adecuada. Golan y yo no podíamos creerlo. Con los ojos como platos, reprimimos las arcadas, balbuceamos algo para disimular la vergüena ajena y practicamos un placaje perfecto sobre el mando a distancia. Si antes teníamos alguna duda, en ese momento ya estaba claro que lo que estaban echando por la tele era realmente… una mierda. Aunque creo recordar que lo que había en las otras cadenas no era mucho mejor.

El propósito último y fundamental de esta entrada en mi bitácora es que me ayudéis a entender cómo puede alguien exhibir sus trapos sucios delante de todo el país, en lugar de disimularlos. Si fueses el padre de esa familia, ¿¿con qué cara irías a trabajar al día siguiente?? Después de eso, soportar las bromitas de los vecinos durante toda tu vida debe ser una mierda (¡ay, perdón!)

Yo debo ser muy raro, porque no lo entiendo.

Y parece que esto es solo el principio.

London as a haven?

· 2 min read

A few months ago I met a Spanish guy living in London who had an interesting explanation for why sooo many people from the rest of the UK, Europe and the whole world decide to come to live in London.

According to his theory, the vast majority of people who come to London give to others (and to themselves) one of the following two reasons. The first one is that they come to learn the language (this is invariably expressed by us Spaniards with the formula “tu imprúf mai ínglis”). The second reason to go living here is that people want to earn more money.

That's rubbish.

Reality is: people come to London just to run away from things. To run away from a job, from a relationship, from a past. From their family, from their environment. From other people. From themselves.

This guy put the high number of gay people in London as an example. Many gays from around the world who feel oppressed in their conservative countries and small towns discover with delight Londoner's open-minded, quasi-indifferent attitude towards them. Massive, anonymous, heterogeneous and vanguardist, no other city takes in people like London.

Now I wonder what I'm running from?

Tampered media

· 2 min read

Politics in Spain is dead boring. At least this is so when comparing with other countries.

I first realized this fact the year I lived in Italy. Italian politicians and parties are more diverse, brave and spontaneous than their Spanish counterparts. The ideological range is much wider, from the communists and radicals (Pannella, Bonino) to the nostalgic xenophobic neofascists (Bossi, Berlusconi). Not to mention the permanent inner fights in the leftish and Catholic parties (L'ulivo, La margherita, Prodi) and the fascinating tentacles of the Catholic Church. Many topics that in Spain are sort of taboo or understood ─civil war, gay rights, laicism vs. Catholicism, manipulation in the media─ are passionately discussed in Italy.

Now I find this George Galloway, a British MP that reminds me of Marco Pannella. Via my new flatmate I discovered this TV clip in which Galloway is interviewed in Sky News on the Lebanon vs. Israel crisis.

From Galloway's very first answer it's crystal clear that the interview is going to be anything but boring. This is a completely different point of view on international politics than the one the mainstream media show in their news. And Galloway puts forward his ideas in such a simple and passionate way that you can't but feel empathic with him. (And pity the newsreader who interviews him).

I also found a rough transcript of the debate.

Stimulating at the least, definitely you don't see these things in Spanish TV.

Opening

· One min read

Abrió sin esfuerzo los ojos y retiró un poco la sábana para refrescarse el torso. El radio-despertador marcaba una hora pequeña. Mirando al techo se rascó la coronilla; no tenía sueño. Ella dormía acurrucada dándole la espalda. Rodó por el colchón hasta quedar muy cerca, junto a su cuerpo desnudo, y comenzó a acariciarle suavemente el hombro y el brazo, tocando con su antebrazo el costado de ella. Le gustaba pasar los dedos (apenas la yema) sobre su piel caliente. Contempló en la penumbra su espalda. La escuchó respirar. Después apoyó la cara en su nuca, se inundó de su olor. Cerró los ojos otra vez. Siguió recorriendo con los dedos su cuerpo inmóvil, descendiendo desde la axila y hacia la cintura, y empezó a sentir una tranquilidad infinita. Se detuvo tanto tiempo en esa caricia que volvió a quedarse dormido antes de que su mano llegase a la cadera de ella.